Skip to main content

Watership Down - Richard Adams

★★★★
I couldn't understand what the big deal is about this book, right up until I read it, that is.  People who love it, really love it.  Now I'm one of them.

Yes, the characters are rabbits, and that might lead you to believe it's a children's book.  Assume that, and you miss out on some really amazing fiction.

By making the characters rabbits, Adams has the option of giving them their own history and mythology.  It also makes it somewhat magical, in that it forces us to think about what other layers of existence are occurring alongside our own.  However, having rabbits as heroes and villains doesn't limit the story in any way.

The rabbits are real characters from the very beginning.  There are leaders and followers, bullies and friends, prophets and warriors.  Some rabbits are as ingenious as others are stupid.  Throughout the book (which comes in at a healthy 476 pages), you really start to identify with the characters.  I think Bigwig ended up being my favorite.  He was brave and true and loyal, but smart enough to understand the big picture when he needed to.

I thought the rabbit mythology was incredibly interesting.  The fact that there were stories within the story really drove home important stories are.  Reading it again, that's an odd sentence, but let me explain.  When the rabbits were afraid or needed guidance, when they were meeting other warrens, or even just when they were passing time, they'd tell stories of their history, of their gods and their ancestors.  The stories themselves were helpful, but the act of storytelling itself was incredibly important.  It was a communal activity.  The stories were oral and shared.  Oddly enough, it made me sad while I was reading the book because of course, I was enjoying it alone.  We've lost a lot of communal storytelling, where a lot of people hear a story at once and then they can talk about it.

My nephew is coming to stay in a few weeks, and I'm going to hold on to this book to read it to him before bed.  Even if we only get part of the way through, I think my sister would finish it with him when he got home.  It's probably a little too hard for him to read by himself, but that's okay.  Interestingly, in the prologue, Richard Adams talks about how people were a little distressed by the "adult themes" present in the book.  Some parts really are quite dark.  He brushes it off, and says that kids know what the world looks like.  I agree.

This counts toward the 100+ Challenge, Chunkster Challenge, and Page to Screen Challenge*.

I was trying to watch the movie before I wrote about this.  I got halfway through and fell asleep one night.  I decided to go ahead and write it up, and then revise the post once I've finished the movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Land of Lost Things

I met my new therapist last week.  I test drove a few, and she was the one that stuck.  She seems like she's not going to let me get by with any bullshit, and she said a couple of things that zinged me in our very first meeting.  That was unexpected, delightful, and now, with time to think about it, terrifying. I've been doing so much soul searching lately, so much careful consideration of my life and where I am - you'd think I'd be finding myself, but instead I feel so completely lost.  A few reasons: 1. I sabotage relationships in a really predictable way.  I had always thought of this behavior in one way, but with one sentence, this woman last week made me question everything I thought about that.  It's good to question it; it's what I wanted, but to be confronted so quickly by something that I had never considered is frightening.  I've spent so much time trying to figure this stuff out, and it turns out that I've been so completely wrong about so

Series Finale

Life is not like Sex and the City, or Private Practice, or any other show where people in their late 20's / 30's / 40's are dating for our amusement. It's not fun. It's not glamorous. Relationships do not end with a lesson learned and a glass of wine. Okay, the wine is fairly accurate. The rest of it is crap. We watch those shows because of how inaccurate they are. We'd like to believe that after our latest heartbreak, we will recline in a bubble bath or in front of our computers, marveling at our newfound wisdom and patting ourselves on the back for becoming a more mature person. Let's for a moment apply this entirely artificial paradigm to my life. The basic ingredients are there: single woman in her distressingly late 20s, eligible-ish men, dates, alcohol, occasionally fabulous clothes. Hell, I've even got the klatch of cackling besties to tell me that the latest guy is unworthy of my distress. The basics are here. Things just don't see

2011 Reading Challenges

On the first day of this new year, I am pulling together the reading challenges in which I want to participate.  There are so many that sound interesting that I'm not doing, particularly a bunch of them that are regional authors, which I'm trying to cover with my Global Reading Challenge.  I've chosen a bunch of them, but the problem won't be reading quantity, but more like reading strategy.  I read 3 or 4 books a week and most of these challenges allow crossovers, so I see no problems reading enough books, merely reading the right books and then, perhaps more challenging, writing about them, which some challenges require, and some only suggest.  Either way, it's a neat way to prioritize reading for the coming year. The Challenges in Which I Shall Participate Southern Literature Challenge - I've never read enough Southern Lit, and while some of the newer stuff is truly awful, I'd like to explore some older books. It's any book set in the South by a S