Skip to main content

Like Fish in a Barrel

Imagine walking through a sea of distracted engineers, free to ogle as your heart desires.  I know, this is only appealing to a certain demographic of nerd, but whatever.  How did I get this privilege? Last Friday I proctored the morning session of the Principles and Practice in Engineering Exam at the Jamil Temple. How did I get involved in this?  A friend told me about it, and it paid $13 an hour to walk around and minimize your yawn volume.

The space is basically an enormous high school gymnasium filled with row upon row of folding tables and chairs.  We had 251 people signed up to take the 8 hour test (2 sessions or 4 hours each).  It consists of practical problems and it's open-book, so the engineers lined up at the door a little before 7 were trailing behind them any and all types of item conveyance, from bins of books on dollies to actual suitcases that I myself would fit into were I folded properly.  There was even a guy with a small rolling bookshelf, a solution I found rather ingenious.  As they entered, we had to check each person's letter of admittance and their photo id, giving me a chance to scope them out at my leisure.

Once they were all seated, we had to explain to them all the specificities of this particular test, of which there were a great many.  They could only use the pencil provided to them, no other personal pencils.  Their materials had to be bound - no loose pieces of reference paper allowed.  Many of them had brought a multitude of snacks and drinks, but those things had to stay on the floor.  With two engineers to a table, and 8 hours of anxiety at stake, if someone spilled a drink on someone else's exam, there would have been an engineer smack-down.  (I can only imagine would that would look like btw.)  The list of rules went on, the test began, and we proctors had 4 long hours in which to find amusement as best we could.

This is when it occurred to us proctors that here was an entire gym of distracted engineers who wouldn't notice if we stared at them for a while.  It was also freezing, so pausing in one place too long might have resulted in hypothermia.  What else were we to do but wander around, scoping out future husbands?  This process was facilitated by the fact that the male to female ratio was approximately 75/25, providing a large number of potential mates to choose from.  We would wander about the room, pick out a cute one or two, check for a ring, and make a mental note of their section and seat number before returning to the front of the room to pass their information on to the other floating proctors for approval.  We also kept a keen eye out for any misconduct, obviously. 

And while this was all in jest and in the sake of maintaining our proctorial diligence (this is actually a pretty boring job), there is something to be said for choosing a husband from this little pool.  They're all engineers, so they're at least kind of smart.  They're educated, indicating some combination of income, drive, and/or resourcefulness.  They are more than likely employed because they can afford to take this ridiculously expensive test.  They are prepared (look at all those books!) and willing / able to show up on time mentally prepared to tackle 8 hours of rigorous, timed, high-stress problem solving.  Because they're engineers, all the stereotypes about social skill deficits must be considered, but one imagines that a woman (or gay man) could do worse.

You could also tell a great deal from how they were taking the test.  How many books did they bring?  Are they an overpreparation type, or the kind who shows up with a few key references?  If they just had a few books, does that mean they were better equipped to distinguish the wheat from the chaff or are they just cocky?  Some of them handled the stress well, working steadily, stretching occasionally.  Others were clearly barely hanging on, twitching, running their fingers frantically through their hair.  One woman took her hair down out of its ponytail and put it back up about once every fifteen minutes.  There was also the situation where someone realized that the one book they needed was the one they didn't bring.  I saw one guy almost cry.  Others looked severely distressed, but pressed on with another approach.  So not only was the population pre-selected, but the activity itself was conducive to learning a lot about one's future partner.

It should be noted that even after all that, 4 hours of circling like a bird of prey, I did not, in fact, meet an engineer.  Interfering with their testing would have resulted in me losing my hard-earned cash, not to mention the fact that they weren't exactly thinking about lady-meeting at the time.  Nevertheless, it made the Friday morning pass relatively painlessly, and I met a couple of highly amusing female graduate students who were instrumental in the ogling process.

I've had a number of interesting experiences like this lately, and I've been a little slack about writing about them, but I hope to get. on. the. ball. and pick back up now that summer is arriving.

Comments

Jessica said…
A friend of mine has a baby daddy who is a chemical engineer. When things got bad with this control freak, she went into counseling. Right away the counselor guessed that she was dating an engineer. I would suggest you look for someone with more creative and less structured proclivities. You might bring more chaos to the table than your standard engineer can handle. Of course, there are a million types of engineers out there so who knows? Software/computer may be the way to go.
Briana said…
What happens when you cross this post with "museum as middle class mating ritual?" does that equal "engineers at a museum?"

Popular posts from this blog

The Land of Lost Things

I met my new therapist last week.  I test drove a few, and she was the one that stuck.  She seems like she's not going to let me get by with any bullshit, and she said a couple of things that zinged me in our very first meeting.  That was unexpected, delightful, and now, with time to think about it, terrifying. I've been doing so much soul searching lately, so much careful consideration of my life and where I am - you'd think I'd be finding myself, but instead I feel so completely lost.  A few reasons: 1. I sabotage relationships in a really predictable way.  I had always thought of this behavior in one way, but with one sentence, this woman last week made me question everything I thought about that.  It's good to question it; it's what I wanted, but to be confronted so quickly by something that I had never considered is frightening.  I've spent so much time trying to figure this stuff out, and it turns out that I've been so completely wrong about ...

Series Finale

Life is not like Sex and the City, or Private Practice, or any other show where people in their late 20's / 30's / 40's are dating for our amusement. It's not fun. It's not glamorous. Relationships do not end with a lesson learned and a glass of wine. Okay, the wine is fairly accurate. The rest of it is crap. We watch those shows because of how inaccurate they are. We'd like to believe that after our latest heartbreak, we will recline in a bubble bath or in front of our computers, marveling at our newfound wisdom and patting ourselves on the back for becoming a more mature person. Let's for a moment apply this entirely artificial paradigm to my life. The basic ingredients are there: single woman in her distressingly late 20s, eligible-ish men, dates, alcohol, occasionally fabulous clothes. Hell, I've even got the klatch of cackling besties to tell me that the latest guy is unworthy of my distress. The basics are here. Things just don't see...

2011 Reading Challenges

On the first day of this new year, I am pulling together the reading challenges in which I want to participate.  There are so many that sound interesting that I'm not doing, particularly a bunch of them that are regional authors, which I'm trying to cover with my Global Reading Challenge.  I've chosen a bunch of them, but the problem won't be reading quantity, but more like reading strategy.  I read 3 or 4 books a week and most of these challenges allow crossovers, so I see no problems reading enough books, merely reading the right books and then, perhaps more challenging, writing about them, which some challenges require, and some only suggest.  Either way, it's a neat way to prioritize reading for the coming year. The Challenges in Which I Shall Participate Southern Literature Challenge - I've never read enough Southern Lit, and while some of the newer stuff is truly awful, I'd like to explore some older books. It's any book set in the South by a S...