Skip to main content

Watership Down - Richard Adams

★★★★
I couldn't understand what the big deal is about this book, right up until I read it, that is.  People who love it, really love it.  Now I'm one of them.

Yes, the characters are rabbits, and that might lead you to believe it's a children's book.  Assume that, and you miss out on some really amazing fiction.

By making the characters rabbits, Adams has the option of giving them their own history and mythology.  It also makes it somewhat magical, in that it forces us to think about what other layers of existence are occurring alongside our own.  However, having rabbits as heroes and villains doesn't limit the story in any way.

The rabbits are real characters from the very beginning.  There are leaders and followers, bullies and friends, prophets and warriors.  Some rabbits are as ingenious as others are stupid.  Throughout the book (which comes in at a healthy 476 pages), you really start to identify with the characters.  I think Bigwig ended up being my favorite.  He was brave and true and loyal, but smart enough to understand the big picture when he needed to.

I thought the rabbit mythology was incredibly interesting.  The fact that there were stories within the story really drove home important stories are.  Reading it again, that's an odd sentence, but let me explain.  When the rabbits were afraid or needed guidance, when they were meeting other warrens, or even just when they were passing time, they'd tell stories of their history, of their gods and their ancestors.  The stories themselves were helpful, but the act of storytelling itself was incredibly important.  It was a communal activity.  The stories were oral and shared.  Oddly enough, it made me sad while I was reading the book because of course, I was enjoying it alone.  We've lost a lot of communal storytelling, where a lot of people hear a story at once and then they can talk about it.

My nephew is coming to stay in a few weeks, and I'm going to hold on to this book to read it to him before bed.  Even if we only get part of the way through, I think my sister would finish it with him when he got home.  It's probably a little too hard for him to read by himself, but that's okay.  Interestingly, in the prologue, Richard Adams talks about how people were a little distressed by the "adult themes" present in the book.  Some parts really are quite dark.  He brushes it off, and says that kids know what the world looks like.  I agree.

This counts toward the 100+ Challenge, Chunkster Challenge, and Page to Screen Challenge*.

I was trying to watch the movie before I wrote about this.  I got halfway through and fell asleep one night.  I decided to go ahead and write it up, and then revise the post once I've finished the movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts from last Thursday: Tonight we set up our Indie Bits game, and I'm consumed by nervous anticipation. I imagine this is not unlike when your firstborn child goes to kindergarten. OK, maybe it's not that serious. But the feelings of, please don't bite anyone , and I hope you make friends translates roughly to please don't break while someone is playing you , and also please no one play this game because What if you don't like it?  What if people hate it? What if it doesn't work? What if it's uninteresting? What if the puzzles are too hard? There are so many ways this can go wrong. These are not feelings I typically experience with the things that I make, as I usually make things just for myself. I've always been more of an engineer then an artist. At middle school art camp, I was competent at various techniques, but I never had any great ideas. We would be set free to our own creative devices with a new method, and I sat there, feeling inad...

2011 Reading Challenges

On the first day of this new year, I am pulling together the reading challenges in which I want to participate.  There are so many that sound interesting that I'm not doing, particularly a bunch of them that are regional authors, which I'm trying to cover with my Global Reading Challenge.  I've chosen a bunch of them, but the problem won't be reading quantity, but more like reading strategy.  I read 3 or 4 books a week and most of these challenges allow crossovers, so I see no problems reading enough books, merely reading the right books and then, perhaps more challenging, writing about them, which some challenges require, and some only suggest.  Either way, it's a neat way to prioritize reading for the coming year. The Challenges in Which I Shall Participate Southern Literature Challenge - I've never read enough Southern Lit, and while some of the newer stuff is truly awful, I'd like to explore some older books. It's any book set in the South by a S...

2021 Reading Challenges

Apparently a blog is forever, since this one is still hanging out there. I could be using it to write about being a traveler, but that's been done and most of my thoughts should remain private anyway (they are *not* flattering). So I'm going to track my 2021 reading challenges instead because that's the only set of goals I'm really setting for myself this year. (2021 goal = have fewer goals.)  League of Extraordinary Penpals It's a secret! This challenge is part of a penpal group that I pay to be in, so they don't want people sharing the challenge. I'm going to try to figure out how to review and track these books here without sharing the challenge in ways that aren't okay.  For now, I'll just say that I'm tackling the Genre-tastic, Book Club, Around the World, Dewey Decimations, and Social Butterfly challenges, not all of which involve reading a book.  Current point tally 4/5/21: 150 5 Countries I'm in an Around the World group on Goodreads ...